[FoRK] Re: FoRKers in the news: Syndic8 games Google, Google gets
jeff at vertexdev.com
Thu May 12 13:10:55 PDT 2005
Ken Meltsner <meltsner at gmail.com> says:
> Google decides that Syndic8 is playing games with search engine
> optimization, issues Order 66 and removes them from the index of
> all things.
> No comments from Darth Barr, though.
This whole thing happened at the worst possible time for me, of course!
I have written my piece here, FoRKed for posterity:
<<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>>
I Was Really Stupid, and Greedy Too
They always say that when it rains it pours, and this week certainly was
a good example of that to me. While in and out of various doctors
offices and hospitals, a particular form of advertising that I used on
Syndic8 became a huge issue with well-intentioned folks all around the
world, inspiring a a flurry of posts on various forums and resulting in
Syndic8s eviction from Google, as a purported keyword or link spammer.
Heres my side of the story
I registered Syndic8.com in August of 2001 and the site was online by
September of that year. At first it ran from a hand-built server in
my home office, through my DSL connection, which, at the time, cost
me $10/GB after the first 3 GB of transfer per month. Bit by bit, the
site became more feature-rich and more well known, and traffic
started to build.
After months of data transfer bills in excess of $200, I had to find a
better way to host it. I found that I could rent a machine at a hosting
company for less than my bandwidth bill. I also tried to make the site
self-funding in the process, adding some Amazon Associates and Cafe
Press links along the way.
The sites popularity grew and grew, and a friend asked me if he could
purchase a link on the site. We agreed on a price, and I put that first
link up. Once that first link was in place, potential advertisers
noticed it, and they also expressed interest in links. While trying to
keep the site from looking too busy, I managed to squeeze in a number of
links on the front page and in other places. I was always up-front about
this, and never resorted to hidden text or anything of that nature.
The money was pretty good, paying my ever-increasing hosting costs and
letting me repay the personal deficit that I had built up over the first
year or so of operation, and even building up a reserve in anticipation
of further expansion of my server subscription (currently at over
Early this year an existing advertiser approached me with an interesting
proposition. They asked me to create some sub-domains on the site, point
the DNS records for these sub-domains to their server, and to link to
them from the front page of Syndic8. I took a look at their proposed
content and it seemed pretty decent, articles about mortgages,
insurance, and so forth, with some links to affiliate programs and some
AdSense blocks. On the surface, all seemed well, and I agreed to take
this on. I didnt look at every page, but the ones I looked at seemed
fine. The pages were, in fact, designed to get the attention of search
engines. Given that theres a whole industry built around SEO (Search
Engine Optimization) I didnt know that I had crossed a line here, but
in retrospect it is clear that I had.
All was fine until early this month when someone found this (hiding in
plain sight at the bottom of each and every page on Syndic8) and decided
to make a public issue over it. In an instant, at a time when I was
least able to respond, my little site was the subject of a lot of
attention and scrutiny, none of it good.
In the space of a day, things progressed from hey, look at this to
those dirty rats to lets tell Google guy to ok, they are toast.
The trial, sentencing, and conviction took place in the blink of an eye.
I became aware of this somewhere after the dirty rats stage. and
wasnt sure how to proceed. Never having been the subject of a public
attack before, I wasnt quite sure of the proper protocol for
responding. It was interesting (and a bit disappointing) to see bold,
vituperative public posts from people that I knew, had worked with, and
had even helped in the past. I was labeled as a spammer, a hacker with
no business sense, and accused of all sorts of indiscretions. Exactly
one person thought to email me and say Im not taking sides here, but I
know it must suck to be you right now.
In this link-happy world, I have found that people are more interesting
in talking about you than talking to you. In the past, I thought that a
private conversation was the first step toward resolution in a situation
like this. Thats not true anymore. Do something wrong and a hundred
bloggers will be happy to publicly point at it and to take some joy in
your trouble. Im not complaining here, just stating a fact. The
Cluetrain tells us that markets are conversations", but I think there
is actually a reluctance to engage in private 1:1 discussion about this.
Apparently it is easier to create a link than to send an email. For the
record, anyone who wants to email me can find me at jeff at vertexdev.com.
What have I learned so far? First, be careful about slippery slopes.
Once you take on a particular form of advertising, the next one doesnt
seem all that bad, but before you know it you are doing things that you
wouldnt otherwise do. Second, consider alternatives to the ad-supported
business model. Lots of people seemed to think that I could have raised
funds in this way. Perhaps, perhaps not. It is clear that trying to
create something thats large and self-sustaining requires more
attention to the business end than I was capable of giving it. Third,
respond, and respond fast when you make a mistake.
Whats next? Our mission remains unchanged, to create a large, public
directory of reviewed RSS and Atom feeds. The offending ads are gone
from the site, and I will certainly not be accepting any more ads of
that nature. The site will stay up and running, perhaps with an
alternate funding source. Ill talk to Google and see if they will let
me back in.
So thats the story of my week so far, and it is only Thursday morning.
<<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>> <<.>>
More information about the FoRK