[FoRK] announce: y! + xspf

Dan Brickley daniel.brickley at bristol.ac.uk
Thu May 12 15:22:00 PDT 2005


Fwd'd with faked From: field in hope of shortcutting 
some administrivia. Hope Xent.com isn't using SPF yet.

Dan

----- Forwarded message from fork-owner at xent.com -----

From: fork-owner at xent.com
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:59:07 -0700
To: danbri at w3.org
Subject: Re: [FoRK] announce: y! + xspf
Message-ID: <mailman.101156.1115935147.20334.fork at xent.com>

You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has
been automatically rejected.  If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
fork-owner at xent.com.


From: Dan Brickley <danbri at w3.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:59:18 -0400
To: lucas at gonze.com, Luis Villa <luis.villa at gmail.com>,
	meltsner at alum.mit.edu, FoRK Now <fork at xent.com>
Subject: Re: [FoRK] announce: y! + xspf
Message-ID: <20050512215918.GD25518 at homer.w3.org>

* Lucas Gonze <lgonze at panix.com> [2005-05-12 11:48-1000]
> >
> >On 5/12/05, Ken Meltsner <meltsner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On 12-May-05, at 1:33 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> >>>>I dunno about realtime streaming in general. There isn't much internet
> >>>>audio/video that needs to be real time,
> >>
> >>[Disclaimer: this stuff is new to me, so I'm probably going to say
> >>stupid things.  That's how I learn....]
> >>
> >>Video has its own real-time metadata as well -- "closed" (text)
> >>captioning comes to mind; descriptive audio might be another.  I have
> >>a decent handle on how this is included in traditional analog
> >>broadcasts, and it's got to be straightforward to piggyback additional
> >>info using time codes onto a recorded piece (external annotation), but
> >>how does metadata get carried with streaming formats?  Streaming
> >>video/audio, I assume, works by breaking up a feed into a series of
> >>frames, with special frames reserved for metadata.  Or does it wedge
> >>the metadata into each frame, sort of like using the unused portion of
> >>a TV field for other purposes (e.g. captioning)?
> >>
> >>Which reminds me, in the senile manner that I've adopted since hitting
> >>forty: A long time ago, the MIT Media Lab had a project that used
> >>caption text to index news programs.  This was analog TV + captions,
> >>not any new-fangled metadata stream, of course.  Could your playlist
> >>format include the equivalent -- lyrics as well as band info, for
> >>example, or an educational text track describing the techniques used
> >>by the sitar player, or the imagery in a recurring motif?  Music
> >>teachers and budding pop culture specialists around the world would
> >>love it....
> >>
> >>And overextending things, could a playlist format like this be used to
> >>combine visuals (e.g. PPT slides or handwriting) in sync with the
> >>audio track?  Or this is all covered by SMIL, which I sorta'
> >>understand since it's just XML after all, and not relevant to the
> >>current topic?

As I understand things re SMIL, the earlier specs allows you to cite 
a timed text file, but didn't define a format for it. So people I guess
used whatever RealPlayer etc understood. There's now a W3C Working Group
on this topic, defining a Timed Text format. See
http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/ and nearby...
-> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ttaf1-dfxp-20050321/
(the name I find a littly cryptic...)

What would be nice, of course, is an opensource player. I'm not aware of 
one but haven't had a good look...

Dan



----- End forwarded message -----


More information about the FoRK mailing list