[FoRK] Fwd: [Processing] download the new beta release!
reza at voicegenesis.com
Fri May 20 00:29:26 PDT 2005
The sort of sad thing here (and I see points on both sides), is that someone
at MS is really enjoying this thread... Unfortunately, a lot of things fall
in the two party system... and if you're not in one of the two parties,
regardless of how right you may be, well, you vote doesn't go far...
So, regardless of who's right here, Linux, GPL, Java, etc. (everything that
is not on the dark side) have to work together, as a matter of economics not
technology. Otherwise, well, you know the rest.
From: fork-bounces at xent.com [mailto:fork-bounces at xent.com]On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 10:43 PM
To: Luis Villa
Cc: FoRK Now
Subject: Re: [FoRK] Fwd: [Processing] download the new beta release!
On 5/20/05, Luis Villa <luis.villa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/20/05, Michael Silk <michaelslists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well I've submitted bugs (1 or 2) that I found in the java compiler,
> > and they were fixed in new releases. I know many other bugs that have
> > been found in production and confirmed via source-review have ben
> > fixed too. I, on the other hand, can't about openoffice, never having
> > used it ...
> > I've found if there is a bug it's generally easy to work around, and
> > if you can't (say for example this
> > one:http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=627844&tstart=45)
> > you just wait for the next version, or downgrade. I
> Downgrade? Eek... I have worked with Sun a bit, and they are paranoid
> about regressions, and I'd certainly think they would be even more so
> about Java- is that not the case?
Downgrade from the users (developers) point of view; not Suns. I.e. if
the latest version has a flaw (like one did with the StringBuffer
issue) then just stay away from it. (As opposed to going in and fixing
FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK