[FoRK] SUVs are the solution
Stephen D. Williams
sdw at lig.net
Sun May 22 10:14:30 PDT 2005
I think this is the same argument made for personal air travel, which I
would be all for. Need a 16 lane to work today? No problem, just let
the regional traffic controller program the autopilots, etc.
Speaking of which, I went almost directly head to head with an F15 last
week. I was at 3000 at 120 knots and he crossed my path less than
1000ft above me doing 450 knots toward me at about a 160 degree path
angle. He was outside his training area, hurrying to get back I suspect.
Too bad I didn't have time to grab my camera while I dove; he was gone
less than 3 seconds after I spotted him.
Luis Villa wrote:
>Brilliant. Joe for President!
>On 5/21/05, Joe Barrera <joe at barrera.org> wrote:
>>So SUVs are the solution to congestion, not the problem.
>>SUVs are meant to drive on bumpy dirt roads, right? So we
>>should build a cheap, parallel set of highways that are undrivable
>>except by SUVs, and force all those with SUVs to drive on them.
>>Non-SUVs would see much less congestion on the roads.
>>SUVs would get better gas millage, driving 55 or slower.
>>It's a win-win situation all around.
>>It's hard to live in this country
>>In the present state of things
>>Your body gets pulled right back
>>You get a terrible urge to drink at 3 a.m.
>>FoRK mailing list
>FoRK mailing list
swilliams at hpti.com http://www.hpti.com Per: sdw at lig.net http://sdw.st
Stephen D. Williams 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 20147-4622 AIM: sdw
More information about the FoRK