[FoRK] Westmoreland Dies...
Stephen D. Williams
Tue Jul 19 12:36:15 PDT 2005
There is a difference between the odds being high (implying high
probability of a very bad outcome) vs. the odds seeming to be very
high. The thing with many wars is that the odds of a really bad outcome
aren't really all that high. Many would argue that the N. Korean's won
a worse fate than they would have "lost".
As with many civil wars, the US would have been better off to have found
a better way to transition. The transition was inevitable; the civil
war was about the worst, but fastest, path. We've all benefitted from
the civil war, in medicine if nothing else (besides the obvious civil
rights), but there had to have been other paths.
Joe Barrera wrote:
> Ian Andrew Bell (FoRK) wrote:
>> The stakes were pretty high in that circumstance..
> Well, yes, as they were for us in WWII. And as they were
> for the Vietnamese. I'm just saying that to attribute tolerance
> of casualties to the Oriental disregard for human life is,
> at best, at odds with our own (US) history.
> - Joe
> FoRK mailing list
swilliams at hpti.com http://www.hpti.com Per: sdw at lig.net http://sdw.st
Stephen D. Williams 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 20147-4622 AIM: sdw
More information about the FoRK