[FoRK] Fwd: Explosive Residue Found On Failed CANAL Debris....!

Tracie K Meyer con10gent_sentience
Mon Sep 12 11:03:52 PDT 2005


On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:30:38 -0700 (PDT), "p barrick"
<*!*@*!*> said:
> *!*@aol.com wrote:To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> From: *!*
> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:16:26 EDT
> Subject: Explosive Residue Found On Failed CANAL
> Debris....!
> 
> I send this out not because I think it's true but because it might be. If
> it is and I've heard this from several places we have to do something
> about it. We need to put pressure on the powers that be to look into this
> along with anyone else we can get involved.
> Paul
> 
> EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE FOUND
> ON FAILED LEVEE DEBRIS! 
> Ruptured New Orleans Levee had help failing 
> 
>   New Orleans, LA -- Divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls
>   surrounding New Orleans found something that piqued their interest:
>   Burn marks on underwater debris chunks from the broken levee wall ! 
> 
> One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, saw the burn
> marks and knew immediately what caused them.  He secreted a small chunk
> of the cement inside his diving suit and later arranged for it to be sent
> to trusted military friends at a The U.S. Army Forensic Laboratory at
> Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing. 
> 
> According to well placed sources, a military forensic specialist
> determined the burn marks on the cement chunks did, in fact, come from
> high  explosives.  The source, speaking on condition of anonymity said
> "We found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as well as
> PBXN-111.  This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive
> devices." 
> 
> The levee ruptures in New Orleans did not take place during Hurricane
> Katrina, but rather a day after the hurricane struck.  Several residents
> of New Orleans and many Emergency Workers reported hearing what sounded
> like large, muffled explosions from the area of the levee, but those were
> initially discounted as gas explosions from homes with leaking gas lines. 
> 
> If these allegations prove true, the ruptured levee which flooded New
> Orleans was a deliberate act of mass destruction perpetrated by someone
> with access to military-grade UNDERWATER high explosives. 

> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 13:23:32 -0400
> From: *!*l.com
> Subject: Explosive Residue Found On Failed CANAL Debris....! 

> Duh!!  How else could a solid steel and brick canal - NOT levee - walls
> have been breached.  It's NOT a levee folks.  It's a canal WALL.  Go to
> Google Earth and check for yourself. 
> So here we have just another 9/11-like exercise.   Now we gotta GO get
> more of them thar terrorists!
> NOT!
 Just another brain scramble.....
> Get used to it.  More surely to come. 
> Fred
> PS.  In the following story, please be sure to substitute the word
> "canal" for "levee."  
>  
> EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE FOUND
> ON FAILED LEVEE DEBRIS! 
> Ruptured New Orleans Levee had help failing 
 
>   New Orleans, LA -- Divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls
>   surrounding New Orleans found something that piqued their interest:
>   Burn marks on underwater debris chunks from the broken levee wall ! 
> 
> One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, saw the burn
> marks and knew immediately what caused them.  He secreted a small chunk
> of the cement inside his diving suit and later arranged for it to be sent
> to trusted military friends at a The U.S. Army Forensic Laboratory at
> Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing. 
> 
> According to well placed sources, a military forensic specialist
> determined the burn marks on the cement chunks did, in fact, come from
> high  explosives.  The source, speaking on condition of anonymity said
> "We found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as well as
> PBXN-111.  This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive
> devices." 
> 
> The levee ruptures in New Orleans did not take place during Hurricane
> Katrina, but rather a day after the hurricane struck.  Several residents
> of New Orleans and many Emergency Workers reported hearing what sounded
> like large, muffled explosions from the area of the levee, but those were
> initially discounted as gas explosions from homes with leaking gas lines. 
> 
> If these allegations prove true, the ruptured levee which flooded New
> Orleans was a deliberate act of mass destruction perpetrated by someone
> with access to military-grade UNDERWATER high explosives. 
====
-tracie
anti-govt socialist
i love We The People but hate Them The State
===
con10gent_sentience at inoutbox.com

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different…



More information about the FoRK mailing list