[FoRK] EBay to buy Skype
Stephen D. Williams
Mon Sep 12 15:07:16 PDT 2005
I agree, as long as you don't completely equate "open" == "blessed
standard". I'm quite happy to use a protocol that is better,
practically speaking, than some PTT-centric design by committee. SMTP
vs. X.400 for instance. The non-standard (i.e. emerging defacto
standard) that Asterisk uses is another good example.
What Skype uses is great; if it was available for anyone to use we'd be
all set. SIP to many has seemed to complicated and it suffers, like a
lot of the multimedia over IP standards, from the core group of purists
who have insisted on architecture that is not firewall or NAT friendly.
Justin Mason wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Joe Barrera writes:
>>Luis Villa wrote:
>> >That sounds like high-grade BS to me. Skype is a tiny, tiny brand when
>> >placed next to 'Apple Talk' or 'Google Talk'; it won't say how many
>>If only 13% of people can even pick out the right definition
>>of VOIP from a multiple choice question, I wonder how
>>many have any idea what a "Skype" is?
>(a) absurd article. why should an end user have to know what VOIP, or
>TCP/IP, or whatever acronym-du-jour, expands to? They just need to
>know what button on their desktop needs clicking to start the app.
>(b) even my parents have been pestering my to run Skype. It's already
>made the mainstream.
>Personally, I hope that Google Talk can bring workable voice chat using
>open protocols. Skype is a very proprietary system.
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Exmh CVS
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>FoRK mailing list
swilliams at hpti.com http://www.hpti.com Per: sdw at lig.net http://sdw.st
Stephen D. Williams 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 20147-4622 AIM: sdw
More information about the FoRK