[FoRK] Re: complaint - please ignore :)
Tue Sep 20 10:00:41 PDT 2005
Thus I felt like it was a direct accusation :-) FWIW I assumed that the
word "denormalization" implies that there was a normalized database to
begin with. I do believe that there are people out there with databases
who have never heard the name Codd. Databases - "you mean like Excel?"
>"Owen Byrne" <owen at permafrost.net> wrote in message
>news:4330156A.7020808 at permafrost.net...
>>I feel like this was directed at me :-). One word - performance. Joins
>>kill it. I'm sure someone else here will have a more verbose response.
>yeah, I know, but that's definitely not the case here... Purposeful
>denormalization would look better than what I'm dealing with...
>I recognize that there's a place for denormalized data.
>Complaints are *supposed* to be overly broad and sweeping, though, lacking
>the nuances of rationality, and refusing to acknowledge reasonable
>FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK