[FoRK] Re: Bad Auto-Aways
Cleopatra Von Ludwig
Fri Sep 23 06:52:45 PDT 2005
I can't understand why people don't use an email account that is separate
from your work -- one on which you would not (could not) set an auto-away
message. Like a free gmail, yahoo, or hotmail account.
See, now that's what I thought would be stating the obvious.
Of course, what really amuses me about this is that one of the annoying
things about the "auto-away" message is that it's essentially spam; with
this latest auto-away message, we've all managed to create even more "spam"
(essentially) by getting all fired up about it. I plead guilty.
On 9/22/05, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
> Actually, this would be tough to fix on the client side. Better to
> standardize on a header or body format and just filter automatically at
> the mailing list. Mailman already filters apparent admin requests;
> filtering away / vacation messages would be a trivial addition.
> If I were to do this (I never stop checking email willingly, even on
> vacation), I'd use a procmail "recipe" which would allow me to do
> Pointing out the obvious, your friend,
> Elias Sinderson wrote:
> > Lucas Gonze wrote:
> >> Ian Andrew Bell (FoRK) wrote:
> >>> Is it just me or does this drive everyone else nuts when this
> >>> happens (weekly)?
> >> Yes. My feeling is that anybody with an auto-away should be
> >> auto-unsubscribed.
> > Also yes, and an enthusiastic +1 on the motion to auto-unsubscribe,
> > provided there is a unsub email sent as well...
> > Most Humbly,
> > Elias
> > _______________________________________________
> > FoRK mailing list
> > http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK