[FoRK] DO NOT MENTION THE WEATHER MACHINE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES
Sat Sep 24 15:55:00 PDT 2005
Haven't your heard? Low dose radiation lowers cancer rates.
You know that people are always saying we need to do something about
rising health costs...
Steve Nordquist wrote:
> Fah! 5 messages in and you're not even down to the
> -use the energy to terraform the non-oil-yielding ocean floor pro
> -solidify 1000^2 sq. km ocean on demand to dissipate hurricane
> -use leftover energy to launch said solid ocean to N. Korea, where
> it can
> be used as a free (and fairly nonradioactive) energy source, melting
> (tongues firmly in cheeks people?) into swirling water when taken
> from the mountains. Someone will have to build a turbine or Terrace
> Different.... Also provides delicious prepared non-native
> species dishes.
> -Use +4 space mirror to 'park' hurricane s.t. Yucatan has better
> build Efreet City.
> -7-hurricane -deathmatch-; city TBA (bluescreen it!!).
> -Gay (Mad, Ancient, Cosmic, Loathing) Anger Neptune + Cht'hulu as
> primary cause....
> -Sprite Zero (0 sweetness and furious fizz!) promotion gone
> horribly wrong.
> -Steven Levitt again called upon by kabal to 'Increase value of
> North Shore,' forced into ill-scoped programme of indirect action.
> -Bush TIA/HLS Plan achieves Zen; know all about it, and evacuate.
>>> Secondarily, depending on fallout cancer rates, just nuke the damn
>>> thing. If projected dead due to cancer were, say, <50 vs. potentially
>> You can't cancel a storm by nuking it. A thunderstorm dissipates more
>> energy than a couple of nukes already. You could use a (very large) nuke
>> (probably several) to deflect it while it emerges.
> Yeees, but -radioactive- category 6 hurricane sounds so much better on
> insurance forms. Those, they pay under 'builder negligence.'
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK