[FoRK] Magnesium / Water cycle hydrogen production
Thu Oct 27 04:47:02 PDT 2005
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Ken Meltsner wrote:
> If you used external combustion -- just burned the metal and used the
> energy to power a Stirling engine, I suppose -- you could avoid
> producing H2 entirely, and you'd pick up a few more points of
> efficiency. Which is beside the point, but one more sign that this
> isn't the best idea overall.
The point of using hydrogen is to not burn it in a Carnot cycle
device but to utilize some >>80% of enthalpy of combustion in
an electrochemical fuel cell.
Also, going electrical has more synergies (less weight, simpler
system, regeneration of braking) which are impossible with
ICUs, regardless which fuel they burn. It's largely about
the weight and the regen braking, though.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the FoRK