[FoRK] Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical.

Luis Villa < luis at tieguy.org > on > Wed Aug 16 19:57:25 PDT 2006

On 8/16/06, Damien Morton <fork at bitfurnace.com> wrote:
> http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2006/08/the_uk_terror_p.html
> August 14, 2006
> The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?
> I have been reading very carefully through all the Sunday newspapers to
> try and analyse the truth from all the scores of pages claiming to
> detail the so-called bomb plot. Unlike the great herd of so-called
> security experts doing the media analysis, I have the advantage of
> having had the very highest security clearances myself, having done a
> huge amount of professional intelligence analysis, and having been
> inside the spin machine.

Sorry, I stopped here. 'I've read the newspapers, and I have
qualifications, so I know what is going on.' What? I... I don't even
know what to say to that. I mean, yes, potentially this is better than
'I've read the newspapers, and I have very poor qualifications, so I
know what is going on', but both are pretty ludicrous.


> So this, I believe, is the true story.
> None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane
> ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of
> the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for
> quite some time.
> In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases
> passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond
> reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide
> bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.
> What is more, many of those arrested had been under surveillance for
> over a year - like thousands of other British Muslims. And not just
> Muslims. Like me. Nothing from that surveillance had indicated the need
> for early arrests.
> Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details of this amazing
> plot to blow up multiple planes - which, rather extraordinarily, had not
> turned up in a year of surveillance. Of course, the interrogators of the
> Pakistani dictator have their ways of making people sing like canaries.
> As I witnessed in Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary
> information this way. Trouble is it always tends to give the
> interrogators all they might want, and more, in a desperate effort to
> stop or avert torture. What it doesn't give is the truth.
> The gentleman being "interrogated" had fled the UK after being wanted
> for questioning over the murder of his uncle some years ago. That might
> be felt to cast some doubt on his reliability. It might also be felt
> that factors other than political ones might be at play within these
> relationships. Much is also being made of large transfers of money
> outside the formal economy. Not in fact too unusual in the British
> Muslim community, but if this activity is criminal, there are many
> possibilities that have nothing to do with terrorism.
> We then have the extraordinary question of Bush and Blair discussing the
> possible arrests over the weekend. Why? I think the answer to that is
> plain. Both in desperate domestic political trouble, they longed for
> "Another 9/11". The intelligence from Pakistan, however dodgy, gave them
> a new 9/11 they could sell to the media. The media has bought,
> wholesale, all the rubbish they have been shovelled.
> We then have the appalling political propaganda of John Reid, Home
> Secretary, making a speech warning us all of the dreadful evil
> threatening us and complaining that "Some people don't get" the need to
> abandon all our traditional liberties. He then went on, according to his
> own propaganda machine, to stay up all night and minutely direct the
> arrests. There could be no clearer evidence that our Police are now just
> a political tool. Like all the best nasty regimes, the knock on the door
> came in the middle of the night, at 2.30am. Those arrested included a
> mother with a six week old baby.
> For those who don't know, it is worth introducing Reid. A hardened
> Stalinist with a long term reputation for personal violence, at Stirling
> Univeristy he was the Communist Party's "Enforcer", (in days when the
> Communist Party ran Stirling University Students' Union, which it should
> not be forgotten was a business with a very substantial cash turnover).
> Reid was sent to beat up those who deviated from the Party line.
> We will now never know if any of those arrested would have gone on to
> make a bomb or buy a plane ticket. Most of them do not fit the "Loner"
> profile you would expect - a tiny percentage of suicide bombers have
> happy marriages and young children. As they were all under surveillance,
> and certainly would have been on airport watch lists, there could have
> been little danger in letting them proceed closer to maturity - that is
> certainly what we would have done with the IRA.
> In all of this, the one thing of which I am certain is that the timing
> is deeply political. This is more propaganda than plot. Of the over one
> thousand British Muslims arrested under anti-terrorist legislation, only
> twelve per cent are ever charged with anything. That is simply
> harrassment of Muslims on an appalling scale. Of those charged, 80% are
> acquitted. Most of the very few - just over two per cent of arrests -
> who are convicted, are not convicted of anything to do terrorism, but of
> some minor offence the Police happened upon while trawling through the
> wreck of the lives they had shattered.
> Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical.
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

More information about the FoRK mailing list