[FoRK] NewTube VS OldTube
Luis Villa <
luis at tieguy.org
> on >
Tue Oct 10 18:13:37 PDT 2006
On 10/10/06, Albert S. <albert.scherbinsky at rogers.com> wrote:
> I'm in awe at your ability to resist the lure of the
> Googleplex. Indexed video would be great. Indexed
> closed captions would imply partnership with the
> oldfangled TV content producers. If they get a
> ClueTube, they may be inclined to go it alone.
They've had video indexing for a while now, at least (publicly) since Jan. 2005:
That was what the original google video was all about, ages and ages ago.
> Can you
> capture closed captioning in any of the video file
All of the significant ones have captioning; many have support for
advanced forms of captioning which not only capture dialogue but
information describing the scene.
> --- Simon Wistow <simon at thegestalt.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:23:25PM -0400, Albert S.
> > said:
> > > Who are the winners and losers in Google's move
> > into
> > > Internet based video?
> > A few months ago I was asked to go for an interview
> > at Google. After the
> > usual 4 interview shennanigans I was offered the job
> > but ended up
> > declining in favour of another offer.
> > The role was for television search. I signed an NDA
> > so I don't want to
> > go into detail but I was asked for ideas on what I
> > thought TV search
> > would be.
> > My ideas ranged from searching TV programs (do scene
> > detection and then
> > combine with an inverted index of the closed
> > captioning and maybed tied
> > into Google News, which I played around with at
> > college 10 years ago) to
> > using all of that Dark Fibre plus set top boxes plus
> > a Bittorrent-mixed
> > -with-Akamai-esque-thing to do a VOD system which
> > could then by mined
> > for marketing data.
> > Of course I wasn't told what they were up to but I
> > don't think I was far
> > off with my ideas.
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK