[FoRK] Annihilation from within...
Jeff Bone <
jbone at place.org
> on >
Sat Dec 9 17:05:56 PST 2006
On Dec 9, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 03:18:01PM -0600, Jeff Bone wrote:
>> There's no conflict here --- we're not talking physics problems,
>> we're talking engineering problems, specifically miniaturization
>> problems. MEG could be dramatically improved through some relatively
> Even if your sensor is um-sized, it's a goodish way above the cortex.
I'm not suggesting that we need anything more than roughly current-
equivalent MEG... Given that we have that already, the major
obstacle to commercial adoption for the apps we're talking about is
purely engineering. What am I missing, here? Newer / cheaper
versions of the same functionality don't have any physical obstacles
that aren't also had by current implementations.
More information about the FoRK