Strawberry Fields Forever Re: [FoRK] invasion was much better than Cats lets do it again and again

Aaron Burt <aaron at> on Tue May 29 10:00:51 PDT 2007

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:22:12PM -0700, Gordon Mohr wrote:
> Tom Higgins wrote:
> >The sad truth is without these subsidies most of if not all the
> >smaller farms would be hurting more so then they are now, for all the
> >work those people do most of them are barely making a living. <snip>
> If we are spending tens of billions of dollars on farm subsidies to 
> provide this 'small farmer' constituency with the rustic, hardscrabble 
> experience they crave, might it not it be cheaper to just build them a 
> giant theme park?

Actually, we're spending tens of billions of dollars to provide the
'agribusiness' constituency with the corporate-welfare experience they
crave.  The farmers themselves are just conduits for the money, and are
mostly having a squeezed-dry-by-your-suppliers experience.

AFAIK, the 'small farmer' constituency doesn't get squat for subsidies.
Especially if they're running mixed and/or organic farms.  The subsidies
mostly pay for stupid, soil-damaging, water-polluting corn/soybean
monoculture, and other weird stuff like milk that's cheaper than water.

BTW, there's a movement to tweak the current farm bill and let the
local/sustainable/organic folks have some scraps of the largesse.
Meantime, once they get past the chemical->organic transition period,
they do OK since their input and seed costs go way down, and their
revenues go way up.

You get what you pay for,

More information about the FoRK mailing list