[FoRK] Why is there any experience of it, at all? (was: GEB, etc.)

Lion Kimbro <lionkimbro at gmail.com> on Tue Jul 10 08:50:08 PDT 2007

On 7/10/07, Elias Sinderson <elias at soe.ucsc.edu> wrote:
> There s only an explanatory gap if you assume that neural activity
> implies associated experience. This is clearly not the case, hence no
> explanatory gap.

  Furthermore, even if you DID think neural activity implies
  associated experience,
  you'd STILL have an explanatory gap:

  What is the nature of the implication?

  By what fundamental force is it backed?

More information about the FoRK mailing list