[FoRK] The State of Consciousness Studies
Stephen D. Williams
<sdw at lig.net> on
Mon Jul 16 20:17:37 PDT 2007
I keep making the mistake that you aren't trying to say something stupid
on purpose, so I interpreted that statement as: "When people stubbornly
insist that Consciousness is the same as the experience of the state
transitions of a live brain, ... no further explanation needed." If you
want to be parsed literally and pedantically, I'm sure that we can
oblige, but that is hardly sporting conversation.
I inferred and interpolated from your statements that the point you were
trying to make was dualist, i.e. that consciousness was more than just
the regular result of the sophisticated, cultured, and educated brain of
plain old neurons made of plain old matter, without a soul providing
some supernatural spark.
Lion Kimbro wrote:
> On 7/16/07, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
>> > When people stubbornly insist that Consciousness is
>> > the same as the brain, end of story, no further explanation
>> > needed, FULL STOP, --
>> > That's just wrong.
>> Prove it.
> I can't prove that an absurdity is wrong.
> It's like:
> sdw: "The letter A is the same thing as the sound of the letter A."
> lion: "No, you're wrong."
> sdw: "Well, prove it."
> lion: "Well, the sound of the letter A, ... it sounds like something.
> But the letter A is just a shape."
> sdw: "I caaaaan't heaaaar youuuuuuuuu..."
> lion: "Fuck this shit."
> sdw: "Why do you insist on dualism? Don't you know that was
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK