[FoRK] [Tech] Goggles, or Projectors?
Kevin Elliott
<k-elliott at wiu.edu> on
Wed Jan 2 16:15:07 PST 2008
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Jef Allbright wrote:
> Rather than wearing goggles, I wonder whether we may find much broader
> preference for very small video projectors displaying high-resolution
> images on any suitable surface and maybe compact scrollable screens as
> the target for a scanning laser built into the front edge of portable
> keyboards?
>
> With reasonably advanced optics, sensors and computation, requirements
> for planarity, incidence angle and even stability of the display
> surface could be relaxed using dynamic compensation in the scanner.
>
> Given the inherent discomfort of goggles, and worse, the interpersonal
> isolation entailed by covering the eyes and part of the face, I
> suspect the personal scanning laser projector may predominate.
I think your overestimating the discomfort/isolation of "covering" the
face. IMHO, The sort of
"google" that goes mainstream would be nearly indistinguishable from a
pair of glasses.
I think the model we heading toward is more like a "HUD" technology
that overlays the world
in a minimally disruptive way.
Arguing against "projector" technology is that magic phrase "any
suitable surface". Sounds
like a pain in the ass to me. Running around trying to find a
suitable wall, worrying about people
shoulder surfing, etc. Hardly discrete. Are we going to have people
forming lines waiting to point
there computer at the wall?
> Comments?
>
> BTW, with suitably detailed public discussion of such technological
> concepts, do we reduce the possibility of such technology being
> restricted with narrowly controlled IP rights?
>
> - Jef
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
More information about the FoRK
mailing list