[FoRK] Armor-piercing silver bullets
Luis Villa
<luis at tieguy.org> on
Mon Mar 3 04:21:52 PST 2008
So what's their secret sauce?
Luis
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Jeff Bone <jbone at place.org> wrote:
>
> Fred Brooks famously claimed in a 1986 paper [1] that there are "no
> [more] silver bullets" in advancing software technology, i.e. no more
> innovations to be had which would increase programmer productivity by
> more than twofold in a matter of two years. In making this
> pronouncement he was addressing improvements that would in some way
> reduce "essential complexity" --- and noted that by reducing
> "accidental complexity" we might see improvements on the order of a
> tenfold increase over a decade.
>
> There are a number of folks that appear to think that maybe Brooks was
> wrong. From among these folks we see efforts such as Paul Graham's
> Arc, which appears to be tackling at least the accidental complexity
> part of things, by embedding an implicit processing model (based on
> continuations, never mind that this fundamentally breaks the Web and
> in effect creates just another monolithic "software jail" in which our
> data may be incarcerated) into a web application server.
>
> More interesting, though, is the recent STEPS effort [2] involving
> Alan Kay and friends at the Viewpoints Research Institute. [3] (Nb.,
> various folks including myself have mentioned the constituent research
> projects of this umbrella project at various points on this list.)
> Their project is quite a bit more ambitious, hoping to "reduce the
> amount of code needed to make systems by a factor of 100, 1000, 10000,
> or more." (Yes, you read that correctly.) And despite this ambitious
> and admittedly somewhat scattershot research effort's relatively short
> history to date --- it's just over a year old --- they're
> demonstrating some impressive achievements:
>
> - a meta-compiler / language toolkit (OMeta) written in about 100
> lines of itself
> - a runtime core including the language toolkit in about 1000 lines
> - usable implementations of TCP and IP totaling less than 200 lines
> of code
> - a significant, useful subset of Cairo (realtime next-gen
> PostScript) in less than 500 lines
> - high-performing Javascript in 170 lines of code
> - Prolog, 90 lines
> - vector graphics toolkit, 450 lines of code
> - Smalltalk, 200 lines
> - Logo, 50 lines
>
> And so on. Note that these do not comprise a single usable system as
> yet; this is a research project consisting of numerous discrete and
> independent projects. One might expect line counts for individual
> subsystems, language implementations, and so on to go up and the
> system evolves and merges into a single artifact --- if it ever does
> --- but one might also expect downward line-count minimizing pressure
> as more common code is refactored and abstracted out.
>
>
> Interesting stuff...
>
> jb
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Silver_Bullet
> [2] http://www.vpri.org/pdf/steps_TR-2007-008.pdf
> [3] http://www.vpri.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
>
More information about the FoRK
mailing list