[FoRK] More iPhone analysis
Luis Villa
<luis at tieguy.org> on
Sat Mar 8 13:41:26 PST 2008
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Ian Andrew Bell <hello at ianbell.com> wrote:
>
> On 8-Mar-08, at 4:44 AM, Jeff Bone wrote:
>
> > On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:17 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> >
> >> Also, no VoIP apps or anything else which threatens their own product
> >> line. Apple has to approve of your business purpose, just like the
> >> phone companies.
> >
> > Small correction, VoIP over wi-fi is apparently fine; just no VoIP
> > over the WAN.
>
> .. which is about as useful as, oh, public WiFi. But of course if you
> have to keep the VoIP app in the foreground in order to receive any
> incoming calls, the whole rest of your handset is utterly useless.
>
> I think this does not bode well for things like Android, even. The
> mid-term analysis is that the Mobile OS is NOT going to open up
> anytime soon. I feel sorry for anyone hoping to monetize exclusively
> in the mobile space for the next 2-3 years. If you can't have
> background apps then you can't have keep alives and push-style
> signalling... effectively mobile phones are about as capable as a web
> browser, which is to say not very.
But this isn't an inherent shortcoming of mobile OSes; just a
design/UI choice that Apple has chosen to enforce. (gmail runs in the
background on my blackberry, for example.)
> Ultimately this is supposed to be self-correcting, but for the
> collusion which has existed in the telecom industry for many decades
> -- now extending to the vertical handset and application providers who
> are trying to advance the ball. It is a model that can only change
> with the introduction of new spectrum owned by an outsider whose prime
> interest is disrupting the marketplace.
Don't hold your breath on that one.
Luis
More information about the FoRK
mailing list