[FoRK] At the risk of inflaming JB and others ...
<jbone at place.org> on
Sat Mar 29 19:19:23 PDT 2008
On Mar 29, 2008, at 8:51 PM, il-young son wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Jeff Bone <jbone at place.org> wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 2008, at 8:10 PM, James Tauber wrote:
>>> I think Hitchens, while not taking the label "neocon" would say he
>>> and the neocons have the same views on foreign policy.
>> I'm not so sure about that. The very succinct version of neo-con
>> foreign policy view is that America specifically has both a right and
>> an obligation to impose global American hegemony by any means
> i'm not sure if this is what their actual motivation is although in
> action it is what they're achieving, at least not in the sense of
> imposing global hegemony just for the sake of it, there's a more
> fundamental reasoning there.
That's a fair observation. The end to which American hegemony is the
means is the perfection of human society; America is the tool of
choice only because it was perceived as having the right mix of
ideological correctness (or at least just enough proto-correctness),
might, and just enough susceptibility to manipulation to be a useful
tool. The more romantic among the neo-cons may occasionally and non-
cynically give nod to a kind of manifest destiny, but I suspect the
more canny among them merely use that sort of thing as a rhetorical
But yes, at the end of the day the neo-cons are utopians. American
hegemony - because that's the shortest path to a perfect world.
More information about the FoRK