[FoRK] The real threat of reactionary socialism
sdw at lig.net
Sun May 25 16:11:37 PDT 2008
Jeff Bone wrote:
> On May 25, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
>> Jeff Bone wrote:
>>> Point being, I still think the overall media reaction relative to
>>> other events of Congressional nuttery is oddly and tellingly mild...
>> Well, my theory is that it's because she's always saying insane things
>> and is an embarrassment to most liberals and hopefully represents
>> a flavor of race-exploitation-porn that by now hopefully is totally
> Yeah, I got it, I understood that already. But this doesn't seem to
> hang together for me because that sort of thing doesn't stop the media
> from making mountains out of various other molehills of nuttery...
I think that here we might be seeing more "polite silence" that gives
religion a break. A still-too-white-maybe media is generally loathe,
outside of ditto-heads and their ilk, of picking on minorities or
well-sanctioned sacred cows lest they be seen as The Man (et al).
Those with no such taboo protections get the full force with no punches
held. It's not fair, and it's not really serving the public, but I
definitely see it at least some of the time.
Additionally, it is common to politely ignore comments by the most
insane among us and just quietly wait until they fade away. The media
shouldn't do this with sitting government officials.
More information about the FoRK