[FoRK] anyone seen this: Paul ONeil and Ron Suskind

Damien Morton dmorton at bitfurnace.com
Mon Jun 23 07:35:42 PDT 2008

Thats a damned good question. I consider myself pretty well informed on 
these issues.

If there was a trial for murder, or at least manslaughter, minutes of a 
meeting in January 2001 looking for excuses start a fight would be 
exhibit #1. Its motivation. Everything else flows from there.

I had heard of this from a friend in an intel community outside of the 
US, who told me that they knew Bush was going to war with Iraq from the 
minute he was elected. I hear this, I think, before that interview, so 
maybe that masked it out for me?

On 6/23/2008 12:48 AM, Jeff Bone wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2008, at 10:48 PM, Damien Morton wrote:
>> Well, I thought it was all supposition, and didnt know that there 
>> were actual minutes from meetings to back it up.
> So here's the second-order question:  given that there were, and that 
> some --- even folks other than insiders --- knew that there were, and 
> that this was reported in some far-flung reaches --- why do you think 
> this isn't more commonly understood?
> I don't know the answer, but this is a common pattern --- and it 
> concerns me gravely.
> Long-baseline press interferometry, my man.  It's the only way to 
> travel in this day and age. ;-)
> jb

More information about the FoRK mailing list