[FoRK] Challenge for Zee and Stephen

Kevin Elliott k-elliott at wiu.edu
Mon Jun 30 10:20:14 PDT 2008

On Jun 30, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Jeff Bone wrote:
> (4) Assuming that in fact in our current system plaintiffs win more  
> than is statistically likely, is that a problem?

Quick comment on this point- "statistically likely" is completely  
meaningless in this context, and tells us very little about the  
correctness of a given situation.  One can argue that in a perfect  
legal system 100% of the time the plaintiff should lose.  In such an  
ideal world, only guilty people end up in court, and only guilty  
people are convicted.

On the other hand, let say that the ration is 50/50?  Does that mean  
half the people are innocent, or does it mean that people are getting  
away with bad things?  Adding to the fun, if your REALLY bad, your  
more likely settle, so your number doesn't even show up in the data,  
but altering the system in favor of the plaintiffs will also make you  
less likely to settle.

I don't think there is any way to establish a sensible number to  
quantify your question.

Kevin Elliott
k-elliott at wiu.edu

More information about the FoRK mailing list