[FoRK] WashPost: Barack Obama for President

Stephen Williams sdw at lig.net
Fri Oct 17 13:04:23 PDT 2008

Elegant, measured, definite.


Barack Obama for President

Friday, October 17, 2008; Page A24

THE NOMINATING process this year produced two unusually talented and 
qualified presidential candidates. There are few public figures we have 
respected more over the years than Sen. John McCain. Yet it is without 
ambivalence that we endorse Sen. Barack Obama for president.

      Friday, Oct. 17 at 3 p.m. ET: Election 2008: Washington Post 
Endorses Obama

The choice is made easy in part by Mr. McCain's disappointing campaign, 
above all his irresponsible selection of a running mate who is not ready 
to be president. It is made easy in larger part, though, because of our 
admiration for Mr. Obama and the impressive qualities he has shown 
during this long race. Yes, we have reservations and concerns, almost 
inevitably, given Mr. Obama's relatively brief experience in national 
politics. But we also have enormous hopes.

Mr. Obama is a man of supple intelligence, with a nuanced grasp of 
complex issues and evident skill at conciliation and consensus-building. 
At home, we believe, he would respond to the economic crisis with a 
healthy respect for markets tempered by justified dismay over rising 
inequality and an understanding of the need for focused regulation. 
Abroad, the best evidence suggests that he would seek to maintain U.S. 
leadership and engagement, continue the fight against terrorists, and 
wage vigorous diplomacy on behalf of U.S. values and interests. Mr. 
Obama has the potential to become a great president. Given the enormous 
problems he would confront from his first day in office, and the damage 
wrought over the past eight years, we would settle for very good.

The first question, in fact, might be why either man wants the job. 
Start with two ongoing wars, both far from being won; an unstable, 
nuclear-armed Pakistan; a resurgent Russia menacing its neighbors; a 
terrorist-supporting Iran racing toward nuclear status; a roiling Middle 
East; a rising China seeking its place in the world. Stir in the threat 
of nuclear or biological terrorism, the burdens of global poverty and 
disease, and accelerating climate change. Domestically, wages have 
stagnated while public education is failing a generation of urban, 
mostly minority children. Now add the possibility of the deepest 
economic trough since the Great Depression.

Not even his fiercest critics would blame President Bush for all of 
these problems, and we are far from being his fiercest critic. But for 
the past eight years, his administration, while pursuing some worthy 
policies (accountability in education, homeland security, the promotion 
of freedom abroad), has also championed some stunningly wrongheaded ones 
(fiscal recklessness, torture, utter disregard for the planet's 
ecological health) and has acted too often with incompetence, arrogance 
or both. A McCain presidency would not equal four more years, but 
outside of his inner circle, Mr. McCain would draw on many of the same 
policymakers who have brought us to our current state. We believe they 
have richly earned, and might even benefit from, some years in the 
political wilderness.

OF COURSE, Mr. Obama offers a great deal more than being not a 
Republican. There are two sets of issues that matter most in judging 
these candidacies. The first has to do with restoring and promoting 
prosperity and sharing its fruits more evenly in a globalizing era that 
has suppressed wages and heightened inequality. Here the choice is not a 
close call. Mr. McCain has little interest in economics and no apparent 
feel for the topic. His principal proposal, doubling down on the Bush 
tax cuts, would exacerbate the fiscal wreckage and the inequality 
simultaneously. Mr. Obama's economic plan contains its share of 
unaffordable promises, but it pushes more in the direction of fairness 
and fiscal health. Both men have pledged to tackle climate change.

Mr. Obama also understands that the most important single counter to 
inequality, and the best way to maintain American competitiveness, is 
improved education, another subject of only modest interest to Mr. 
McCain. Mr. Obama would focus attention on early education and on 
helping families so that another generation of poor children doesn't 
lose out. His budgets would be less likely to squeeze out important 
programs such as Head Start and Pell grants. Though he has been less 
definitive than we would like, he supports accountability measures for 
public schools and providing parents choices by means of charter schools.

A better health-care system also is crucial to bolstering U.S. 
competitiveness and relieving worker insecurity. Mr. McCain is right to 
advocate an end to the tax favoritism showed to employer plans. This 
system works against lower-income people, and Mr. Obama has disparaged 
the McCain proposal in deceptive ways. But Mr. McCain's health plan 
doesn't do enough to protect those who cannot afford health insurance. 
Mr. Obama hopes to steer the country toward universal coverage by 
charting a course between government mandates and individual choice, 
though we question whether his plan is affordable or does enough to 
contain costs.

The next president is apt to have the chance to nominate one or more 
Supreme Court justices. Given the court's current precarious balance, we 
think Obama appointees could have a positive impact on issues from 
detention policy and executive power to privacy protections and civil 

Overshadowing all of these policy choices may be the financial crisis 
and the recession it is likely to spawn. It is almost impossible to 
predict what policies will be called for by January, but certainly the 
country will want in its president a combination of nimbleness and 
steadfastness -- precisely the qualities Mr. Obama has displayed during 
the past few weeks. When he might have been scoring political points 
against the incumbent, he instead responsibly urged fellow Democrats in 
Congress to back Mr. Bush's financial rescue plan. He has surrounded 
himself with top-notch, experienced, centrist economic advisers -- 
perhaps the best warranty that, unlike some past presidents of modest 
experience, Mr. Obama will not ride into town determined to reinvent 
every policy wheel. Some have disparaged Mr. Obama as too cool, but his 
unflappability over the past few weeks -- indeed, over two years of 
campaigning -- strikes us as exactly what Americans might want in their 
president at a time of great uncertainty.

ON THE SECOND set of issues, having to do with keeping America safe in a 
dangerous world, it is a closer call. Mr. McCain has deep knowledge and 
a longstanding commitment to promoting U.S. leadership and values.

But Mr. Obama, as anyone who reads his books can tell, also has a 
sophisticated understanding of the world and America's place in it. He, 
too, is committed to maintaining U.S. leadership and sticking up for 
democratic values, as his recent defense of tiny Georgia makes clear. We 
hope he would navigate between the amoral realism of some in his party 
and the counterproductive cocksureness of the current administration, 
especially in its first term. On most policies, such as the need to go 
after al-Qaeda, check Iran's nuclear ambitions and fight HIV/AIDS 
abroad, he differs little from Mr. Bush or Mr. McCain. But he promises 
defter diplomacy and greater commitment to allies. His team overstates 
the likelihood that either of those can produce dramatically better 
results, but both are certainly worth trying.

Mr. Obama's greatest deviation from current policy is also our biggest 
worry: his insistence on withdrawing U.S. combat troops from Iraq on a 
fixed timeline. Thanks to the surge that Mr. Obama opposed, it may be 
feasible to withdraw many troops during his first two years in office. 
But if it isn't -- and U.S. generals have warned that the hard-won gains 
of the past 18 months could be lost by a precipitous withdrawal -- we 
can only hope and assume that Mr. Obama would recognize the strategic 
importance of success in Iraq and adjust his plans.

We also can only hope that the alarming anti-trade rhetoric we have 
heard from Mr. Obama during the campaign would give way to the 
understanding of the benefits of trade reflected in his writings. A 
silver lining of the financial crisis may be the flexibility it gives 
Mr. Obama to override some of the interest groups and members of 
Congress in his own party who oppose open trade, as well as to pursue 
the entitlement reform that he surely understands is needed.

IT GIVES US no pleasure to oppose Mr. McCain. Over the years, he has 
been a force for principle and bipartisanship. He fought to recognize 
Vietnam, though some of his fellow ex-POWs vilified him for it. He stood 
up for humane immigration reform, though he knew Republican primary 
voters would punish him for it. He opposed torture and promoted campaign 
finance reform, a cause that Mr. Obama injured when he broke his promise 
to accept public financing in the general election campaign. Mr. McCain 
staked his career on finding a strategy for success in Iraq when just 
about everyone else in Washington was ready to give up. We think that 
he, too, might make a pretty good president.

But the stress of a campaign can reveal some essential truths, and the 
picture of Mr. McCain that emerged this year is far from reassuring. To 
pass his party's tax-cut litmus test, he jettisoned his commitment to 
balanced budgets. He hasn't come up with a coherent agenda, and at times 
he has seemed rash and impulsive. And we find no way to square his 
professed passion for America's national security with his choice of a 
running mate who, no matter what her other strengths, is not prepared to 
be commander in chief.

ANY PRESIDENTIAL vote is a gamble, and Mr. Obama's résumé is undoubtedly 
thin. We had hoped, throughout this long campaign, to see more evidence 
that Mr. Obama might stand up to Democratic orthodoxy and end, as he 
said in his announcement speech, "our chronic avoidance of tough decisions."

But Mr. Obama's temperament is unlike anything we've seen on the 
national stage in many years. He is deliberate but not indecisive; 
eloquent but a master of substance and detail; preternaturally confident 
but eager to hear opposing points of view. He has inspired millions of 
voters of diverse ages and races, no small thing in our often divided 
and cynical country. We think he is the right man for a perilous moment.

More information about the FoRK mailing list