[FoRK] scribd sucks dead dogs balls
dmorton at bitfurnace.com
Sat Nov 15 14:54:23 PST 2008
I often wonder if the firewalling and NAT-ing of the worlds users is as a
result of a corporatist urge to keep the middleman role open. Like the
self-censoring journalist of Chomsky, the worlds internet users cannot
publish with someone's else's permission. Where is notion of rendezvous,
where two users can agree to open ports to each other?
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
> Luis Villa wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:19 PM, damien morton <dmorton at bitfurnace.com>
>>> Luis (eagerly awaiting the day every citizen has a self-publishing
>>>> platform with p2p mechanisms for distribution of bandwidth costs in
>>>> case of spikes in popularity)
>>> Whatever happened to freenet?
>> Failed to write a ffox plugin and so died? :) I was thinking more like
>> bittorrent built into browser + every publishing tool, or like
>> coralcdn. (Not that I object to anonymity but transparency/web
>> integration is critical for real adoption, and ISTR that freenet was
>> terrible at that?)
> A ffox plugin is exactly what I had been thinking about. Actually, I think
> it's something like bittorrent + memcached so it handles more than just
> static web access.
> I am puzzled why ffox doesn't already have bittorrent integrated in a way
> that works transparently with standard web servers like Apache and Lighttpd.
> What prevents something like that from being successful?
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK