[FoRK] Kling vs. Hanson, Kurzweil, and GAI (sort of)
Ken Ganshirt @ Yahoo
ken_ganshirt at yahoo.ca
Sun Nov 1 12:13:51 PST 2009
[Yeah, I know all about the horrors of top-posting but I leave Jeff's note attached for reference, not because I'm responding to any specific statement in it.]
Thanks for posting that, Jeff. It's interesting ... when I read Kling's Friday article yesterday I was planning to use exactly those essays to support my contention that we are likely even farther from virtualizing anything remotely resembling human intelligence than my own most pessimistic guess to this point.
If we want to send out a "wavefront of human intelligence" it has to be human intelligence. The very best I can see in any forseeable future (a century or two, not decades) would be the agents that Kling talked about. That's barely machine intelligence. It's not even close to human intelligence.
After reading Kling I think I'll keep my focus on ways to get this generation ship under control, either proactively or by teaching my progeny how to survive what comes next so they can be part of the next attempt.
--- On Sun, 11/1/09, Jeff Bone <jbone at place.org> wrote:
> From: Jeff Bone <jbone at place.org>
> Subject: [FoRK] Kling vs. Hanson, Kurzweil, and GAI (sort of)
> To: "Friends of Rohit Khare" <fork at xent.com>
> Received: Sunday, November 1, 2009, 12:28 PM
> Interesting stuff, some meat, thought-provoking.
> Kling v. Hanson and arguments-from-authority from this past
> Kling's "Where I'd Bet Against Kurzweil" from 2005 (with
> relevant and insightful analysis)
> Kling's "On Intelligence, People, and Computers" from 2004
> FoRK mailing list
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
More information about the FoRK