[FoRK] spdy

Stephen Williams sdw at lig.net
Thu Nov 12 18:33:37 PST 2009

Lucas Gonze wrote:
>> Lucas Gonze wrote:
>>> How about a bandwidth price [of SSL]?  There must be a bandwidth increase or
>>> there wouldn't be any chaff in the stream.
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Stephen D. Williams
>> I don't follow.  The bandwidth usage should only increase slightly
>> (key/certificate/negotiation overhead), minus any compression being missed
>> out on, except it should already be compressed and will be before
>> encryption.
> I was thinking that there must be chaff in the encrypted stream to
> conceal the length of the source document.  But now that I think about
> it that doesn't really make sense.

There is such a concept, "cover traffic", which was apparently used in 
some DoD Cold War-era communications.  However it's not really used
in any usual communications, especially not at the casual SSL/TLS level.

There is a kind of non-encryption encryption called "Wheat and Chaff" 
also, different idea.


More information about the FoRK mailing list