[FoRK] Stand up and face the future
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Dec 21 06:28:41 PST 2009
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:28:01PM +1100, silky wrote:
> I'm reading this now (it'll be a few weeks before I'm finished ...)
> but one thing that I can't help but wonder immediately: Do we *need*
> "planet-scalable" systems? IMHO, the answer is: "No". I don't think
No. We don't need a planet-scalable system. We need to be able to
scale to the solar system, the galaxy and beyond. Where else are
we supposed to live, in pressurized tin cans?
> everyone needs to use the same system, I don't think everything should
But we're using the same system right now -- the Internet.
Right now it's just the transport layer, but if you add generic
processing and storage capacity, however minimal, and location
awareness/geographic routing you can create a scalable system
everybody and everything could use. Just with simple tags, database
queries and geographic broadcasts you can do interesting things
> be connected, and I think it's quite reasonable for there to be some
Everything should and can be connected. And it can be a more
lightweight than a whole IPv6 stack, and yet scale down to microscale.
> reasonably-small limit on the amount of "things" a site can connect
> to, and I'm okay with various delays or limits imposed on a system due
> to it's nature (i.e. real-time).
If it's about stupid social networks, why does the system not
represent spatial relationship explicitly in every node on every
street corner you could query, in realtime? It's the whole
planet hammering a few racks in a room that doesn't make a lot
> That said, I do think the article is interesting, but I don't think
> the motivation for it is "good", whether or not it happens.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the FoRK