[FoRK] The World Is Not Flat

Ken Ganshirt @ Yahoo ken_ganshirt at yahoo.ca
Tue Jan 19 19:04:35 PST 2010

--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Stephen Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:

> > 
> > ... How does any of that relate to any of my comments or questions?
> > Clearly I've missed your point completely. 
> I was responding to JB's original message on those
> points.  I was actually more agreeing with your
> resistance metaphor than disagreeing with anything.

I see that now. Thanks for clarifying.

> > 
> > In assessing resistance of intermediations, as a
> metric, I'm suggesting that the factors in assessing the
> resistance would be something like the ratio of:
> > 
> > a) the value added to the good by an intermediation, ...
> >   
> As long as you include as "value added" the savings over
> alternate paths to the market or saved inefficiencies over
> less capable local suppliers. 


> > ... TO
> > b) the extraction from the available aggregate margin
> > of the good by an intermediation.
> >   
> As long as there is competition, this is the price of an
> incentive to create a less resistance path.


> In other words, the higher the existing costs, the higher
> the incentive to go into business to lower those costs,
> benefiting everyone.

And he brings it right back to one of Jeff's thorniest of thorns. Good work. And, Yes.


Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! 


More information about the FoRK mailing list