[FoRK] i[phone|pad|wank] jobsian goodness

Stephen Williams sdw at lig.net
Thu Apr 8 15:06:09 PDT 2010

On 4/8/10 2:59 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> It's mind bending to see them go balls to the wall on Adobe, one giant
> to another.  Isn't there some fairy tale with drunk giants fighting?
> Jack and the Beanstalk?
> But the idea of what they're doing is fucking crazy.  Really repellent.

And a stunningly bad move when Android is suddenly viable, everywhere, 
and totally open development wise.
Even Palm / WebOS isn't as bad.  I'm hoping for an Android + WebOS 
merger.  Perhaps with an Objective-C / iPhone/pad compatibility 
environment. ;-)

With a Processing target so every teenager can build their own sharable 
Java apps.  I am appreciating Dalvik more lately.

> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Damien Morton<dmorton at bitfurnace.com>  wrote:
>> http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/iphone_agreement_bans_flash_compiler
>> In the new version of the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement
>> released by Apple today (and which developers must agree to before
>> downloading the 4.0 SDK beta), section 3.3.1 now reads:
>> 3.3.1 — Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed
>> by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs. Applications must be
>> originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed by the
>> iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code written in C, C++, and Objective-C
>> may compile and directly link against the Documented APIs (e.g.,
>> Applications that link to Documented APIs through an intermediary
>> translation or compatibility layer or tool are prohibited).
>> _______________________________________________
>> FoRK mailing list
>> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

More information about the FoRK mailing list