[FoRK] The Ni-64 "theory" of "cold fusion" (more energy hacks)

Michael Cummins michael at i-magery.com
Mon Jun 14 12:03:39 PDT 2010

I like following the news on Polywell Fusion, though Nickel is much more
abundant than Boron.




-----Original Message-----
From: fork-bounces at xent.com [mailto:fork-bounces at xent.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 2:07 PM
To: Friends of Rohit Khare
Subject: [FoRK] The Ni-64 "theory" of "cold fusion" (more energy hacks)

Some interesting back-of-envelope figures, here.  If this is correct, upping
the production of nickel globally / annually by a factor of a little over
two could substitute for all oil-related energy production.  (There are a
few unrealistic assumptions there.  At least.)


Nickel is the fifth most common element on Earth. 
Russia and Canada are currently the top producers, accounting for about 40%
and 30% respectively of global production.

To head off the OB_EUGEN critique, like all the proposed fixes beyond e.g.
ubiquitous solar, this one's obviously transient / non-sustainable over the
long haul, and only economically viable over some range of time.  (Though,
to be fair, even solar is "transient" on  long-enough time scale.)


FoRK mailing list

More information about the FoRK mailing list