[FoRK] Right Wing Conspiracy Theory Talking Points, Volume 2010, Number 6
Stephen D. Williams
sdw at lig.net
Thu Jun 17 05:23:06 PDT 2010
On 6/17/10 4:57 AM, Jeff Bone wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 2:32, "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
>> On 6/16/10 11:52 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
>>> On Jun 16, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
>>>> The crazies are always in the Other party, aren't they?
>>> For me, the "other party" is anyone who *has* a party.
>> Good. I generally am independent, but I've added one party to the
>> kill-list (uh oh, that technical term won't do here will it? How
>> about Bozo List? ) due to a long series of fiascos, so there is a
>> lot of defaulting going on.
> Tsk, tsk. Not both? I see your cry of independence and call
> shenanigans. O'Reilly makes that claim too, you know. Most do. Most
> Then there's the problem with defaults... Aka "bias."
One's over 50% bias, the other is somewhat under. It's a bias, i.e.
agreement/disagreement probability, not a rule.
More information about the FoRK