[FoRK] Right Wing Conspiracy Theory Talking Points, Volume 2010, Number 6

Stephen D. Williams sdw at lig.net
Thu Jun 17 05:23:06 PDT 2010


On 6/17/10 4:57 AM, Jeff Bone wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 2:32, "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6/16/10 11:52 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
>>> On Jun 16, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>> The crazies are always in the Other party, aren't they?
>>>>
>>>
>>> For me, the "other party" is anyone who *has* a party.
>>
>> Good.  I generally am independent, but I've added one party to the 
>> kill-list (uh oh, that technical term won't do here will it?  How 
>> about Bozo List? [1]) due to a long series of fiascos, so there is a 
>> lot of defaulting going on.
>
> Tsk, tsk.  Not both?  I see your cry of independence and call 
> shenanigans.  O'Reilly makes that claim too, you know.  Most do.  Most 
> aren't.
>
> Then there's the problem with defaults... Aka "bias."

One's over 50% bias, the other is somewhat under.  It's a bias, i.e. 
agreement/disagreement probability, not a rule.

>
> jb

sdw



More information about the FoRK mailing list