[FoRK] The bee sting theory of poverty
jbone at place.org
Mon Jun 28 22:53:27 PDT 2010
On Jun 28, 2010, at 11:43 PM, "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
> In other words, proper participants could expect that the baseline could be obtained with a reasonable subset of their income and time in that community.
I do notice an interesting new angle in your attempt to make sense of nonsense, here.
"Reasonable subset." Mmm hmm. Who gets to decide what's reasonable, here? Again, no reasonable preference-aggregating decision process is possible in the general case. Only fully distributed ones work, but that won't satisfy you.
> And it isn't the Gov't providing this stuff, necessarily or preferentially.
Who then gets to reallocate resources to ensure your "reasonable subset" condition is satisfied?
If it walks like a duck...
Now, really, I'm done beating this dead horse. Read the book, or not.
> My point with that wording is that, as a baseline, people need clothes for at least:
> * General protection from the elements / modesty
> * Working / school formalities / uniforms
> * Misc. which includes exercise/sports-compatible clothing.
The latter just underscores the ludicrousness of this discussion.
More information about the FoRK