[FoRK] 2009 Distribution of Wealth in the US

Reza B'Far reza.bfar at oracle.com
Fri Nov 5 16:04:40 PDT 2010

I do think there is one relationship:

Every human being spends some percentage of his/her life doing something for 
resources (working, etc.).  Algorithmically speaking :), I do not believe there 
is a stable matching for a set where:

   1. There exist large number of human beings who have a lot in common and are
      connected through some electronic media
   2. There exist large differential between work/reward ratio for a large
      portion of folks in (1) above.

On 11/5/10 3:53 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> On 11/5/10 2:47 PM, Reza B'Far wrote:
>> The disturbing part, to me, is the aggregate sum of the amount of wealth 
>> concentrated in the 0.01% range.  Is that really a sustainable model for a 
>> society?
> I don't see an obvious relationship between concentration and sustainability 
> without some baseline benchmark.  It's not a zero-sum game overall, although 
> things like the yearly budget are mostly zero-sum.
> Even things like a poverty benchmark only make sense so far.  If you can have 
> effective rent of $50/mo., it doesn't matter as much that you don't have so 
> much income.  You can simplify things by making everyone have to pay a certain 
> baseline, but that doesn't guarantee that things are better for everyone.  
> Concentrating on creating cheaper & better living circumstances may be much 
> more beneficial than raising income or leveling off the peaks.
> Here's a perverse endpoint of fairness analysis: Perhaps people living in 
> areas of the country with lower standards of living should be paying more 
> taxes.  Perhaps they are unfairly benefiting from those of us working hard, 
> paying high rents & taxes in urbanish areas.  ;-)  And those Chinese, with 
> their apparent cost of living of $200/mo., they are unfairly benefiting too.  
> Their gov. must be subsidizing their cost of living, therefore their output is 
> subsidized too.
> The range of my lowest and highest cost of living independently and supporting 
> a family (measured as monthly committed budget) is a factor of about 80.  The 
> peak expensive months cost about 80x the least expensive months.
> Stephen
>> *Reza B'Far, EE, PE*
>> Phone: 1.949.623.0452
>> Senior Development Director
>> *Oracle USA*
>> 17901 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700
>> Irvine, CA 92614
>> On 11/5/10 1:55 PM, Lorin Rivers wrote:
>>> http://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/netcomp.cgi?year=2009
>>> People who earn a million+ make up 0.02532% of the US population.
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

More information about the FoRK mailing list