[FoRK] Plumbing, power, sign posts - getting simple things wrong
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Mar 21 04:33:56 PDT 2011
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:49:02PM -0700, Stephen Williams wrote:
> How, even in the 70's, do you get simple plumbing so wrong? They should
> have had 3 redundant systems, one of which included a pipe some distance
> away that simply required input of water.
Anything that begins with "people should" is a losing proposition.
They don't do you that favor, and you can't make them.
> Re: Terrible bus accident in NY: The road department has to share some of
> the blame. Not culpable, but certainly they were negligent to some
> extent for putting an immovable force on the side of a major highway.
> There is no reason to do this: Either anchor signs and lights past a
> guardrail, or make them shearable. You might notice that most highway
> and street light poles are thin metal sheerable poles. Whether by design
> or not, this has probably saved many lives by not splitting impacting
> vehicles in two as much.
> Simple principles, zero modern technology, disasters that could have been averted with no significant cost.
> Perhaps this is a good opportunity to educate everyone on nuclear science
I'm slightly informed on nuclear science, operation realities,
business constraints and human nature. Verdict: not viable.
We would be so fucked, but luckily we can do well without.
> while not overly activating the nucular paranoid. Hopefully we'll now A)
> replace our old reactors and B) build a few more while we're at it. And
> C) get a better plan for disposing / recycling of spent fuel.
Yo, check dis out
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the FoRK