[FoRK] interesting electoral concept
Gregory Alan Bolcer
greg at bolcer.org
Wed Aug 31 10:32:32 PDT 2011
As pointed out, better minds have spent time trying to figure it out.
It's not going to be solved on this list.
Agitprop is an appropriate metaphor OR are you not being properly
tolerant of things you consider inappropriate but which others consider
appropriate--things like differing opinions, for instance--to allow for
variance of list views, which seems to have for nearly everyone on the
list collectively become vastly tolerant of newbies spouting their crap.
I thought they used to make people take a test before joining FoRK.
On 8/31/2011 10:19 AM, Jebadiah Moore wrote:
> I'm not sure what I did to rattle your chains, since all I was asking about
> was what particular justification (if any) convinced you to believe in some
> particular form of moral absolutism. It's true that I was asking because I
> have yet to hear a convincing justification for it, not because I was trying
> to dissuade you (or anyone else from it), but because I'm open to hearing
> arguments for absolutism.
> So 'agitprop' is hardly an appropriate metaphor. And I don't think that
> thinking about your moral system and its foundations can really be
> considered mental masturbation, since even if a moral absolute exists,
> people don't all seem to be able to agree on what it is. (And historical
> philosophy books wouldn't do me much good since I was looking to hear your
> personal choice rather than a general defense for moral absolutism.)
> FoRK mailing list
greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
More information about the FoRK