[FoRK] Republicanism as Religion
Gregory Alan Bolcer
greg at bolcer.org
Thu Sep 15 11:23:31 PDT 2011
On 9/15/2011 11:07 AM, Gary Stock wrote:
> It calls attention to historical malfeasance.
Not sure what this means? Historical malfeasance in that congress did
the politically expedient thing of passing an unpopular debt ceiling
raise instead of being financially responsible?
> More crucial at the moment: having ~not~ complained 85 times -- while
> benefiting from it, even personally -- and ~then~ complaining so
> bitterly, reveals an appalling degree of hypocrisy.
I disagree completely. You would have to be intellectually dishonest to
not recognize the objective, analytic, differences between what's
changed when the debt ceiling was previously passed and what it means to
currently pass it without reforms. To me, the smokescreen is trying to
change the subject to how many times it was passed versus looking at the
actual debt, gdp, spending and ROI numbers.
Let's try something even simpler. Do you think the US would have kept
its credit rating if the debt ceiling was passed without any spending
> That kind of misdirection -- while denigrating and blocking potential
> solutions over political dogma, rather than fact -- constitutes
> intentional dishonesty. It's the same flavor of dishonesty being
> directed against science, for example.
> Such dishonesty puts us all at risk. All of us. ALL of us.
> FoRK mailing list
greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
More information about the FoRK