[FoRK] Take a step back...
sdw at lig.net
Sun Sep 25 21:20:49 PDT 2011
On 9/25/11 8:50 PM, Russell Turpin wrote:
> For thirty years, someone with the dollars could book a supersonic
> flight across the Atlantic.
> That stopped, almost a decade ago.
> Which would surprise most anyone in 1980, asked how commercial flight
> would proceed. The alleged S-shaped curve for technology delivered to
> the consumer proved, in this case, to be shaped more like a dromedary.
> Maybe it was marketing overshoot. Maybe a bit of regression due to
> exogenous constraints. And, yeah, shaving a couple of hours off
> crossing the Atlantic matters far less than the other unpleasantness
> now associated with flying.
The rise of the Internet and related technological improvements (fast computers, digital cameras, etc.) removed most of the urgency
for getting there fast for meetings. A technology curve for time-to-communicate + quality-to-communicate would remain mostly positive.
I wouldn't be surprised if the defense protocols in clearing a "fast mover" through international boundaries was such a pain as to
be a significant negative cost.
SpaceX has cost per pound for orbit down to $1000. Drop that by 1.5+ magnitudes, adding in a composite landing craft, and the
Concorde might be surpassed.
> But I'm curious what there are other salient examples there are of
> "consumer technology regression."
More information about the FoRK