[FoRK] and this is why I don't have a Google+ profile
Gregory Alan Bolcer
greg at bolcer.org
Fri Oct 28 08:12:19 PDT 2011
They're halfway between LinkedIn and Facebook. I thought it was a
pretty sane policy. Given the amount of russian and islamic invites I
get on a weekly basis, I wish they'd fix their "allow who can invite me"
policy more than their nym one which I think is doing just fine.
Besides the "WASP names only" is such a mischaracterization. If you use
a nym to purchase a cell phone or have a credit card, then that nym is
perfectly acceptable to G+. It's people who want to use a nym and then
turn around and use that nym to do promotion, well that's when they get
*themselves* in trouble.
On 10/28/2011 8:04 AM, Bill Humphries wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> The scuttlebutt is that the Googlers who have been critical of the "WASP names only" policy have been put on "performance improvement plans."
> Google's insistence on this leads me to think they are trying to become the "reputation credit agency," which will only cause more grievous harm to the world. They don't have to get reputation right, they just have to convince employers, schools, and governments that they they need to run background checks on everyone.
> -- whump
> FoRK mailing list
greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
More information about the FoRK