[FoRK] overhead of RESTful stuff

Gregory Alan Bolcer greg at bolcer.org
Thu Mar 8 11:23:42 PST 2012


Of course.  Meant reusable (and decentralizable) data should be 100% 
cachable as the definition.

But that's the definition of a cache, no?

Greg

On 3/8/2012 11:04 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Gregory Alan Bolcer<greg at bolcer.org>wrote:
>
>> +1 to Lisa also, but that cuts to the heart of REST though, right?  A
>> truly compliant REST application would be 100% cachable.
>>
>> Only if its data never, ever changed :)
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
>

-- 
greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476


More information about the FoRK mailing list