[FoRK] overhead of RESTful stuff
Gregory Alan Bolcer
greg at bolcer.org
Thu Mar 8 11:23:42 PST 2012
Of course. Meant reusable (and decentralizable) data should be 100%
cachable as the definition.
But that's the definition of a cache, no?
On 3/8/2012 11:04 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Gregory Alan Bolcer<greg at bolcer.org>wrote:
>> +1 to Lisa also, but that cuts to the heart of REST though, right? A
>> truly compliant REST application would be 100% cachable.
>> Only if its data never, ever changed :)
> FoRK mailing list
greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
More information about the FoRK