[FoRK] Static ec-static intensities of superlative techno-transcendentalizing futurology
Stephen D. Williams
sdw at lig.net
Sun Jun 3 09:40:34 PDT 2012
So bad it's good.
On 6/2/12 9:49 PM, Gary Stock wrote:
> I was relieved to see Brandon and Jay critique Carrico's outlandishly pretentious style -- so I didn't have to go over there and
> do it.
> On 6/2/12 3:00 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
>> Heh. Disasterbatory. " Post-Transhumanist reformation" "mehum (mere human) sheeple types"
>> 'And when I declare that the more assertively "techno-transcendental" varieties of futurological discourse (like the
>> transhumanists, the singularitarians, the techno-immortalists, the nano-cornucopians, the digital-utopians) are simply extreme
>> and hyperbolic variations of mainstream neoliberal global developmental policy discourse and mainstream marketing, advertising,
>> and PR forms, this latter claim shouldn't be seen as undermining the first. Because there is an unmistakably faith-mobilizing
>> pseudo-transcendentalizing strain to be discerned in this very PR marketing imaginary, deranging us from our present distress
>> into a yearning toward consumer techno-futures bathed in pastels and robots and cars and DNA helices and chocolate and glossy
>> hair and youthful skin and golden sex.'
More information about the FoRK