[FoRK] Newsroom score: American Taliban
dmorton at bitfurnace.com
Thu Aug 30 08:42:51 PDT 2012
So here's a thought about how to reduce the influence of money on politics.
If Voter ID is reasonable, surely Spender ID is also reasonable, in
which people spending money for political purposes need to prove their
own citizenship, but also need to prove that the money they are
spending does not include money from foreign sources.
This would of course rule out donations from most multinational
corporations, and of course from the chamber of commerce.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
> I like it. Two senators for California, Taxes (oops, Texas: no wonder they
> are self-conscious about hiding taxation), NYC, etc. is crazy.
> On 8/30/12 8:11 AM, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
>> But still not a bad idea though?
>> On 8/30/2012 7:59 AM, Gary Stock wrote:
>>> Actually, there are at least three much more important reasons:
>>> 1) It would reduce the power of a Senator and a Representative.
>>> 2) It would reduce the power of parties to control candidacies.
>>> 3) It would reduce the power of lobbyists to obscure that work.
>>> Any ONE of those makes an otherwise useful proposal impossible.
>>> On 8/30/12 10:12 AM, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
>>>> Why not just triple the number of senators and quadruple the number of
>>>> house seats?
>>>> The only reason they don't is because the size of the capitol.
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK