[FoRK] bitcoins vs. alchemy
gojomo-forkxent at xavvy.com
Wed Dec 5 19:31:50 PST 2012
The limits on Bitcoin creation are imposed by a schedule laid down in
the initial design of the system, *not* computational power.
Relative computational power just helps nodes 'win' allocations
according to that original schedule. The difficulty threshold for
winning even self-adjusts as bitcoins are disbursed, so no matter how
fast computation improves, 21 million BTC will be handed out through
2140 CE, then no more.
The balances in the system are quite interesting and worth reading
about. There are potential problems and risks, but increasing production
with computational progress is not an issue.
On 12/5/12 4:26 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
> There would never have been a gold standard if alchemy were possible.
> The supply of gold is roughly constant. That's a precondition of the
> gold standard.
> But crunching bits improves every day... clock rate and algorithms and
> better architectures (GPUs). And amazing things can be done when solving
> a very specific problem (e.g. mining bitcoins).
> So what rational person would invest in bitcoins?
> - Joe
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK