[FoRK] Women With Both High Math and Verbal Ability Appear Less Likely to Choose Science Careers Because Their Dual Skills Confer More Career Options
dmorton at bitfurnace.com
Mon Apr 8 17:14:32 PDT 2013
So this is not a response to the STEM question but I have a friend who is
in finance and she is an intelligent woman, and her complaint is basically
that "these people are so smart but they are basically retards"
- over-focussed, with no social skills. Finance geeks.
I'm sure that the same kind of critique is levelled at science geeks as
with finance geeks.
What is desired is not just money or success but social standing.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Lucas Gonze <lucas.gonze at gmail.com> wrote:
> Which opens the question of why women usually see STEM work as so
> unpleasant. Why wouldn't they seek it out just for the fun of it?
> I mean this sincerely.
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
> > On 4/8/13 2:06 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:01:27PM -0700, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
> >>> On 4/8/2013 1:52 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> >>> http://www.news.pitt.edu/**women_STEM<
> >>>> Women With Both High Math and Verbal Ability Appear Less Likely to
> >>>> Choose
> >>>> Science Careers Because Their Dual Skills Confer More Career Options
> >>> Is this not also true of men who have both high verbal and math skills?
> >> Probably. I would like to see similar studies done on that.
> >> I wonder what careers in particular they choose instead of science. I
> >>> assume they are careers that pay better.
> >> Probably.
> > Careers that seem to "pay" better: More prestige, flash, popular
> > imagination, excitement, etc. Look at sports, musicians, artists: A few
> > make a lot, most are doing something else to make a living, possibly
> > failed to prepare for another career.
> > The core problem is the perception vs. reality vs. probability gap,
> > coupled with the technology, cultural, and economic trends. People make
> > poor choices. The government and other organizations make poor choices
> > too, canceling research and development while not otherwise supporting
> > people in those fields who then scatter to some other pursuit, therefore
> > being unavailable when the next need arises.
> >> In that case, why are we trying to convince women to choose lower
> >>> careers?
> >> Probably because we want to insult their intelligence.
> >> Maybe the problem is actually whether this society (in particular US
> >>> society) values science as it ought to?
> >> Indeed. Unfortunately, feedback to that is considerably delayed.
> >> And the culprits will lack the mental wherewhithal to make the
> >> connection, or, rather, they expect that nobody else will make
> >> the connection, in time.
> > sdw
> > ______________________________**_________________
> > FoRK mailing list
> > http://xent.com/mailman/**listinfo/fork<
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK