[FoRK] outsourcing back end

Joseph S. Barrera III joe at barrera.org
Tue May 7 15:23:56 PDT 2013


That's for server side (said the newly minted JavaScript expert).

- Joe

On 5/7/2013 3:19 PM, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
> Node.js?
>
> On 5/7/2013 3:14 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>> I think pure HTML fallbacks are no longer necessary. And I say this as a
>> holdout.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ken Meltsner <meltsner at alum.mit.edu> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III <joe at barrera.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2013 2:46 PM, Ken Meltsner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So, essentially a rich HTML/JavaScript client?  Those seem to run 
>>>>> into
>>>>
>>>>> brick walls w.r.t. browser support, but if you can be ruthless about
>>>> that,
>>>>> it has been shown to work.  Pure HTML fallbacks are a good idea.
>>>>
>>>> Aren't things like jQuery supposed to solve this problem for you?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do they?  My experience is probably dated, then.  You need to decide
>>> whether 98% compatibility is sufficient, or whatever number you can 
>>> pull
>>> out of your hat.
>>>
>>> Ken.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FoRK mailing list
>>> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FoRK mailing list
>> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
>>
>



More information about the FoRK mailing list