[FoRK] outsourcing back end

Lucas Gonze lucas.gonze at gmail.com
Wed May 8 09:36:40 PDT 2013


Node is very fine grained. Often more fine grained than necessary.


On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Gregory Alan Bolcer <greg at bolcer.org> wrote:

> Node.js?
>
>
> On 5/7/2013 3:14 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
>
>> I think pure HTML fallbacks are no longer necessary. And I say this as a
>> holdout.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Ken Meltsner <meltsner at alum.mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III <joe at barrera.org
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>  On 5/7/2013 2:46 PM, Ken Meltsner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  So, essentially a rich HTML/JavaScript client?  Those seem to run into
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  brick walls w.r.t. browser support, but if you can be ruthless about
>>>>>
>>>> that,
>>>>
>>>>> it has been shown to work.  Pure HTML fallbacks are a good idea.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aren't things like jQuery supposed to solve this problem for you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do they?  My experience is probably dated, then.  You need to decide
>>> whether 98% compatibility is sufficient, or whatever number you can pull
>>> out of your hat.
>>>
>>> Ken.
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> FoRK mailing list
>>> http://xent.com/mailman/**listinfo/fork<http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>
>>>
>>>  ______________________________**_________________
>> FoRK mailing list
>> http://xent.com/mailman/**listinfo/fork<http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>
>>
>>
> --
> greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/**listinfo/fork<http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>
>


More information about the FoRK mailing list