[FoRK] ridiculous project
eugen at leitl.org
Tue Jul 9 01:32:39 PDT 2013
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 08:56:11PM -0700, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
> On 7/7/2013 11:48 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > Why not FORTH?
> Not a bad idea. Having grown up with HP calculators I am happy to
> deal with an RPN language. But there was (famously) a 4KB BASIC...
> was there a 4KB FORTH?
How about a 66 Byte Forth?
If you want it really fancy, download a 200 lines of Verilog
http://excamera.com/files/j1demo/verilog/j1.v for 16 bit
and a complete system including TCP/IP stack under 8 K
Without the stack about 2 K
> I'll probably end up just doing my own language. It will probably
> look like some cross between FORTH and HP 67. With strong string
> primitives in the spirit of SNOBOL.
More information about the FoRK