[FoRK] The fusion of anti-rationalism with anti-intellectualism - deliberate gullibility: My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge
Gregory Alan Bolcer
greg at bolcer.org
Mon Jan 26 11:21:15 PST 2015
Illusory superiority, the above average effect, superiority bias, leniency
error, sense of relative superioriry, the primus inter pares effect, the
Lake Wobegon effect, and the California driver syndrome. All right there
in the manual.
Svenson (1981) surveyed 161 students in Sweden
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden> and the United States
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States>, asking them to compare their
driving safety and skill to the other people in the experiment. For driving
skill, 93% of the US sample and 69% of the Swedish sample put themselves in
the top 50% (above the median). For safety, 88% of the US group and 77% of
the Swedish sample put themselves in the top 50%.
McCormick, Walkey and Green (1986) found similar results in their study,
asking 178 participants to evaluate their position on eight different
dimensions relating to driving skill (examples include the "dangerous-safe"
dimension and the "considerate-inconsiderate" dimension). Only a small
minority rated themselves as below average (the midpoint of the dimension
scale) at any point, and when all eight dimensions were considered together
it was found that almost 80% of participants had evaluated themselves as
being above the average driver.
A survey by Princeton Survey Research Associates showed that 36% of drivers
believe they are an above average driver while using a phone for things
like texting or email compared to other drivers who are using their phones
for things like texting or email, while 44% considered themselves average,
and 18% below average.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Bill Kearney <wkearney99 at hotmail.com>
> Somehow I'm more inclined toward thinking this has more to do with
> hand-wringing on the part of those considering themselves "intelligent"
> than it does about any of the stupid people.
> We met with a lot of that when blogging and newsfeeds became possible.
> All kinds of "concern" from those that considered themselves 'gatekeepers'
> or otherwise 'authorities' in fields suddenly cluttered with a lot of
> 'unprofessional' bloggers.
> Stupid people have always been able to congregate. Being online doesn't
> somehow automate their ability to rise above their usual level of
> stupidity, at least not in an actionable sort of way.
> -Bill Kearney
> -----Original Message----- From: Stephen D. Williams
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 4:25 PM
> To: Friends of Rohit Khare
> Subject: Re: [FoRK] The fusion of anti-rationalism with
> anti-intellectualism - deliberate gullibility: My ignorance is just as good
> as your knowledge
> The belief is that it is worse now because of the Internet, political
> polarization and manipulation, etc.
> In the past, the unthinking masses had trouble reinforcing each other
> quite so effectively. Now, they have almost equal publishing
> and visible, documented association as academics, and they can do it in a
> self-selected online monoculture that avoids much
> tempering with other views.
> FoRK mailing list
greg at bolcer.org, http://bolcer.org, c: +1.714.928.5476
More information about the FoRK