[FoRK] Quarters needed for Apple to put Microsoft out of our misery?

Stephen D. Williams sdw at lig.net
Fri Jan 30 13:57:09 PST 2015


During an idle moment, I looked for Microsoft cloud architecture details:
2008:
http://www.slideshare.net/davidcchou/microsoft-cloud-services-architecture-presentation
2011:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/hh127072.aspx
2014 Oct:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/windowsserver/archive/2014/10/20/unveiling-the-microsoft-cloud-platform-system-powered-by-dell.aspx#504832

sdw

On 1/30/15 1:25 PM, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
> On 1/30/15 1:04 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Stephen D. Williams <sdw at lig.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/30/15 10:34 AM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
>>>> […odd anti-Microsoft screed elided…]
>>> An unusually blunt pro-consumer screed I think.
>>
>> Microsoft’s business is about the enterprise, not the consumer. Apple and Google are about the consumer, not the enterprise. Both 
>> Microsoft and Google desperately wanted to be in each others’ core business, but neither have the DNA to do it well. Microsoft 
>> accepted and reoriented around this reality a few years ago even though they have significant business units that are consumer 
>> focused.
>>
>> While Microsoft are late to the game, they do not have a lot of competition in their core market which has bought them time.
>
> That's mostly fair, although there's little reason for most apps to be anything other than browser / Linux server based web apps. 
> It seems like the cat's out of the bag in those areas.  There is a radical divergence between traditional enterprise technology 
> and modern enterprise technology, as exemplified by choices startups make.  Google, Amazon, IBM, and others and to a lesser extent 
> Apple have proven the new models, and made them highly available. Maybe Microsoft can battle on an equal footing at some point, 
> but at the moment it seems they are mainly benefiting from market momentum mainframe style.  Mostly I see debacles like 
> Sharepoint: It brought in piles of cash while providing quite a mess, powering a whole industry to try to make it usable.  The 
> complexities of programming for it are a perfect illustration.
>
>>> You mean running Linux containers on Azure, which wasn't what I was talking about, or running apps in containers in Windows?  I 
>>> haven't heard they solved the latter, but it is overdue.
>>
>> Why you would care about containers on Windows? You just spent words disparaging the idea that anyone would want to run anything 
>> but Linux servers. In fact, Microsoft has been building out support to seamlessly blend Linux and Windows server infrastructures 
>> and services.
>
> For servers, there's little competition for Linux.  For the desktop, where a lot of constant pain happens, containers would be one 
> way for Windows to harden enough to be acceptable.  It is such a messy situation that may not happen.
>
>> My impression is that Microsoft no longer views the Windows operating system as any kind of long-term strategic cornerstone. It 
>> will generate revenue for a long time, and some very popular enterprise software runs well there, but it could fade into the 
>> sunset over the long-term and that would be fine. They are building a new, higher-level cloud-centric operating system for the 
>> enterprise market; the nature of the client devices are no longer their concern, they will eventually integrate seamlessly with 
>> all of them. There will be a lot of Linux under all of that.
>
> It does seem that they are thinking along those lines.  Viability is about whether they can actually divorce themselves of the 
> idea & practicallity of Windows centricity in time.  When I can install interesting packages with Ubuntu or MacPorts or at least 
> the App Store, they may start to be a player.
>
>>
>>
>>> True, some parts are great.  Compilers, Visual Studio for the most part.  Can I run those on OS X or Linux?  Can I develop a 
>>> Qt/C++ app for Android?
>>
>> How is this even relevant? Ignoring that major parts of Microsoft's compiler tool chain have been or are in the process of being 
>> open sourced and ported to Linux + OS X, of course. Visual Studio and Xcode are designed for a significantly disjoint set of 
>> programming languages, so I am not even sure what portable IDEs would buy you.
>
> C++ is the common core language.  Although the trend is for IDEs to support multiple languages well.  .Net / C# are being open 
> sourced more completely, but practically nobody cares.  It is way too late.
>
>>
>> My point had nothing to do with GUIs for compilers. Most of the interesting things are happening on the server side.
>
> Such as?  What might I consider integrating into a modern, scalable, efficient web app framework for both local and public cloud use?
>
>
> sdw
>
> _______________________________________________
> FoRK mailing list
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork


-- 
Stephen D. Williams sdw at lig.net stephendwilliams at gmail.com LinkedIn: http://sdw.st/in
V:650-450-UNIX (8649) V:866.SDW.UNIX V:703.371.9362 F:703.995.0407
AIM:sdw Skype:StephenDWilliams Yahoo:sdwlignet Resume: http://sdw.st/gres
Personal: http://sdw.st facebook.com/sdwlig twitter.com/scienteer



More information about the FoRK mailing list